Please follow for more updates. Thank you
Graham Potter has been having poor performance in Chelsea in the recent past which has put him on the spot. People have been asking why he does not want to use Pierre Emerick Aubamayang. In the match against Fulham, analysts say that if he would have used Aubamayang well he would have won. Chelsea suffered a 2-1 defeat. Since arrival of Aubamayang he has not played much games as anticipated.
This is what Graham Potter had to say about not using Aubamayang. "We had a back five and felt we should go to a 4-4-1 and keep Kai Havertz on because I felt he was leading the line and winning challenges and duels."
"We wanted to use Hakim Ziyech and Carney Chukwuemeka to break from wide and Conor Gallagher to break from the centre because you know you’re going to get driven back a bit. So that was the thinking."

Content created and supplied by: Mosetimedia (via Opera
News )
Opera News is a free to use platform and the views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent, reflect or express the views of Opera News. Any/all written content and images displayed are provided by the blogger/author, appear herein as submitted by the blogger/author and are unedited by Opera News. Opera News does not consent to nor does it condone the posting of any content that violates the rights (including the copyrights) of any third party, nor content that may malign, inter alia, any religion, ethnic group, organization, gender, company, or individual. Opera News furthermore does not condone the use of our platform for the purposes encouraging/endorsing hate speech, violation of human rights and/or utterances of a defamatory nature. If the content contained herein violates any of your rights, including those of copyright, and/or violates any the above mentioned factors, you are requested to immediately notify us using via the following email address operanews-external(at)opera.com and/or report the article using the available reporting functionality built into our Platform
See More
COMMENTS